20 Slang Terms for Law Enforcement Personnel

20 Slang Terms for Law Enforcement Personnel 20 Slang Terms for Law Enforcement Personnel 20 Slang Terms for Law Enforcement Personnel By Mark Nichol A variety of more or less colorful colloquialisms referring to police officers and similar authority figures have developed in American English, sometimes inspired by other languages. Here is a list of such terms. 1. barney: This gently derogatory term refers to Barney Fife, a bumbling small-town deputy sheriff in the classic 1960s sitcom The Andy Griffith Show. 2. bear: This term, from truckers’ slang, alludes to a style of hat worn by some law enforcement personnel- one that resembles the one worn by fire-safety icon Smokey the Bear. (See also Smokey.) 3. the boys in blue: This folksy phrase refers to the frequent use of blue as the color of a police officer’s uniform- and harks back to a time when only men could become police officers. 4. bull: a term prevalent in the first half of the twentieth century, primarily referring to railroad police but pertaining to regular police officers as well and alluding to the aggressiveness of these officials. 5. cop: A truncation of copper from British English usage, referring to someone who cops, or captures. 6. dick: A derogatory abbreviation of detective. 7. federales: Originally a Spanish term for federal police in Mexico, but jocularly used in the United States to refer to police in general. 8. the feds: A truncation of federal, referring to federal law enforcement personnel. 9. five-O: A term for police derived from the title of the television series Hawaii Five-O, about a special police unit by that name. 10. flatfoot: A reference to a police officer, with several possible origins, including the association that police who walked a beat supposedly would get the medical condition of flat feet. 11. fuzz: Originally a British English term referring to felt-covered helmets worn by London police officers, later borrowed into American English. 12. G-man: A term (derived from â€Å"government man†) from the mid-twentieth century, referring to FBI agents. 13. gendarmes: Originally a French term for rural police officers, borrowed into American English as jocular slang. 14. gumshoe: A term alluding to soft-soled shoes worn by detectives that are more comfortable than hard-soled shoes and/or enable them to follow suspects surreptitiously. 15. the heat: A reference to the pressure that law enforcement officials apply to suspects. 16. the law: A collective term for law enforcement. 17. the man: A term alluding to the imposing authority of law enforcement personnel. 18. pig: A derogatory term dating back to the 1800s that fell into disuse but was revived during the civil rights era. 19. po-po: A reduplicative term referring to police officers. 20. Smokey: A term for law enforcement personnel, derived from an association of the style of hat worn by some state troopers with the one worn by Smokey the Bear. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:20 Great Opening Lines to Inspire the Start of Your StoryBody Parts as Tools of MeasurementIs "Number" Singular or Plural?

Geography of Madagascar

Geography of Madagascar Madagascar  is a large island nation located in the  Indian Ocean  east of Africa and the country Mozambique. It is the fourth largest island in the world and it is an  African country. Madagascars official name is the Republic of Madagascar. The country is sparsely populated with a  population density  of only 94 persons per square mile (36 persons per square kilometer). As such, most of Madagascar is undeveloped, incredibly biodiverse forest land. Madagascar is home to 5% of the worlds species, many of which are native only to Madagascar. Population:  21,281,844 (July 2010 estimate)Capital:  AntananarivoArea:  226,658 square miles (587,041 sq km)Coastline:  3,000 miles (4,828 km)Highest Point:  Maromokotro at 9,435 feet (2,876 m)Lowest Point:  The Indian Ocean History of Madagascar It is believed that Madagascar was uninhabited until the 1st century C.E. when sailors from Indonesia arrived on the island. From there, migrations from other Pacific lands as well as Africa increased and various tribal groups began to develop in Madagascar- the largest of which was the Malagasy. The written history of Madagascar did not begin until the 7th century C.E. when Arabs began setting up trading posts on the islands northern coastal regions.European contact with Madagascar did not begin until the 1500s. At that time, the Portuguese captain, Diego Dias discovered the island while on a voyage to India. In the 17th century, the French established various along the east coast. In 1896, Madagascar officially became a French colony.Madagascar remained under French control until 1942 when  British troops  occupied the area during World War II. In 1943, though the French retook the island from the British and maintained control until the late 1950s. In 1956, Madagascar began moving toward independence and on October 14, 1958, the Malagasy Republic was formed as an independent state within the French colonies. In 1959, Madagascar adopted its first constitution and achieved full independence on June 26, 1960. Government of Madagascar Today, Madagascars government is considered a republic with a legal system based on French civil law and traditional Malagasy laws. Madagascar as an executive branch of government that is made up of a  chief of state  and a head of state, as well as a bicameral legislature consisting of the Senat and the Assemblee Nationale. Madagascars judicial branch of government is comprised of the Supreme Court and the High Constitutional Court. The country is divided into six provinces (Antananarivo, Antsiranana, Fianarantsoa, Mahajanga, Toamasina, and Toliara) for local administration. Economics and Land Use in Madagascar Madagascars economy is currently growing but at a slow pace. Agriculture is the main sector of the economy and employs about 80% of the countrys population. The main agricultural products of Madagascar include coffee, vanilla, sugarcane, cloves, cocoa, rice, cassava, beans, bananas, peanuts, and livestock products. The country does have a small amount of industry of which the largest are: meat processing, seafood, soap, breweries, tanneries, sugar, textiles, glassware, cement, automobile assembly, paper, and petroleum. In addition, with the rise of  ecotourism, Madagascar has seen a rise in tourism and the related service sector industries. Geography, Climate, and Biodiversity of Madagascar Madagascar is considered a part of southern Africa as it is located in the  Indian Ocean east of Mozambique. It is a large island that has a narrow coastal plain with a high plateau and mountains in its center. Madagascars highest mountain is Maromokotro at 9,435 feet (2,876 m).The climate of Madagascar varies based on location on the island but it is tropical along the coastal regions, temperate inland and arid in the south its portions. Madagascars capital and largest city, Antananarivo, which is located in the northern part of the country somewhat away from the coast has a January average high temperature of 82 °F (28 °C) and a July average low of 50 °F (10 °C).Madagascar is most well-known around the world for its rich biodiversity and  tropical rainforests. The island is home to about 5% of the worlds plant and animal species and about 80% of those are endemic or native only to Madagascar. These include all species of  lemurs  and about 9,000 different species of plants. Because of their isolation on Madagascar, many of these endemic species are also threatened or endangered due to increasing  deforestation  and development. To protect its species, Madagascar has many national parks, and nature and wildlife reserves. In addition, there are several  UNESCO certified  World Heritage Sites  on Madagascar called the  Rainforests of the Atsinanana. More Facts about Madagascar Madagascar has a life expectancy of 62.9 years. Its official languages are Malagasy, French, and English. Today, Madagascar has 18 Malagasy tribes, as well as groups of French, Indian Comoran, and Chinese people. References Central Intelligence Agency. (27 May 2010).  CIA - The World Factbook - Madagascar.Infoplease.com. (n.d.).  Madagascar: History, Geography, Government, and Culture, Infoplease.com.United States Department of State. (2 November 2009).  Madagascar.Wikipedia. (14 June 2010).  Madagascar, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.

Team Model Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Team Model - Assignment Example Workers may be indistinct in respect to what strengthening implies in substantial terms. The assignment includes the task to others of the power for specific capacities, errands, and choices. Strengthening is giving representatives the ability to make their employment. The idea of strengthening is nearly interfaced to inspiration and client administration. Representatives need to feel that their activities tally and strengthening are about getting this going (Boynton & amp; Fisher, 2005). Imparted choice making can enhance the quality and acknowledgement of choices, support specialist inspiration and respect toward oneself, expand the feeling of possession and enhance interpersonal relations with representatives (Lencioni, 2002). It is not simple to delegate. A rancher asked why his laborers came specifically to him with their issues and inquiries, skipping directly over the foreman. Upon further reflection, this cultivator understood that he was empowered this conduct by noting inquiries and tackling issues for the representatives. Rather, he required to help his foreman by having workers go to him with these matters (McConkey, 1974). There is a dubious equalization, here, on the other hand. While specialists ought to feel the need to work out normal issues straightforwardly with the ranch foreman, the entryway ought to be left open for laborers to sense that the rancher can hear them out, as well. In one homestead operation, the cultivator made it clear to the workers that his entryway was interested in listening on the off chance that they ever required talking. When the agriculturist would leave the field, be that as it may, the foreman would close that entryway, by advising workers that they were not to ever trouble the producer (Webb, 2002). The only way good team effectiveness can be felt is when the team work as a group to develop individual strength to maximize their

The rising cost of college tuition Research Paper

The rising cost of college tuition - Research Paper Example Some parents and students harbor the feeling that college education is an investment (Butler and Foundation Heritage 3). Therefore, they anticipate returns from the money spent. The societal perspective towards college education is to a given extent pegged towards cost whereas on another extent pegged towards the value that one would achieve out of this investment. The high cost of college education deprives persons from low-income families to acquire college education. Alongside meeting the high cost of living that has skyrocketed in the last few decades, parents have to spend more dollars in meeting the education needs of their children. The result is a continuous struggle by the low-income communities to change their lives. On the other sense, some analysts hold the view high cost of college education derail the prestige and the status of the United States higher education. Many people have started questioning the whether the students get the value for the money they pay in their bid to acquire college education. The rise in cost of college education in various states is quite astonishing given the need to acquire education for the future. ... Arguably, the challenges as well as the demands in the society seem to limit individuals from stopping the quest for college education. Some critics have pointed out that rate of increase in tuition cost have consistently exceeded the overall inflation rate. The view of critics comparing the rise in college cost to the inflation rate concludes that there has to something wrong somewhere with industry whose firms consistently raise prices faster than the inflation rate. It is unusual for firms to experience growth that is much higher than the inflation rate. The rise in the college cost has predisposed many students to seek alternative funding including acquiring education loans that they are not able to pay until they acquire employment. Many students have huge debts, which they have acquired because of their attempt to seek college education. Further, some students have to enroll for work-study program in order to raise tuition fee for their education. Although education is instrume ntal to the lives of the people today, the high college cost seems to favor a given clique in the society. The cost for engineering or medical course, for example is not affordable to a student who comes from a humble background. The fear that some critics tend to harbor is that while everybody seems to appreciate the importance of education, many might not be able to acquire such services in future especially students from low-income communities (Wilson). Largely, this argument seems to point on social economic constraints experienced by the parents and students from less fortunate families. Since money defines the type of course that a student would pursue in college, there are some possibility that some students would settle on pursuing careers that they did not

Dividend Discount Model and Price Earning Model

Dividend Discount Model and Price Earning Model Financial theory holds that the value of a share of stock is equal to the sum of the discounted future expected dividends. The Dividend Discount (DD) requires two inputs, firstly a forecast of future dividends and secondly, a rate at which these dividends will be discounted to their present value. The appropriate discount rate that will be used is the rate of return available on risk-free investments plus a risk premium. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is one of the most widely used models for calculating discount rates. Once the discount rate estimated, all future dividends must be discounted to their present value. Although near term dividends may be estimated with some confidence, to make the DD model operational an assumption regarding long term dividends is necessary. Two common assumptions regarding dividend growth and their associated valuation models are: (i) Earnings growth as well as dividend growth will be constant with the Gordon Model, and (ii) Multiple stages of growth can be approximated. Therefore, it is obvious that the forecasts and the assumptions necessary for operating DD models induce the emergence of significant errors into this theoretically correct approach. Common Stock Valuation Concepts The value of a common stock can be defined as the present value of the future dividend stream in perpetuity. This concept is consistent with the assumption that the corporation will indeed have a perpetual life, in accordance with its charter. If the value of a stock is equivalent to the value for a perpetual annuity with a constant level of payments, the general formula is as follows: Value per share of stock = Where = Expected dividend per share = Cost of equity The formula shown above for stock valuation treats the firm together with its stock as if they will exist forever. There are two basic inputs to the model. First is the expected dividends and secondly the cost on equity. To obtain the expected dividends, we make assumptions about expected future growth rates in earnings and payout ratios. The required rate of return on a stock is determined by its riskiness, measured differently in different models, the market beta in the CAPM, and the factor betas in the arbitrage and multi-factor models. The model is flexible enough to allow for time-varying discount rates, where the time variation is caused by expected changes in interest rates or risk across time. Zero growth model In this model it is assumed that the same amount of dividend will be paid for all the time periods up until infinity. The formula is given as follows after it has been simplified by using the formula sum to infinity of geometric progression: Where V = value, D = dividends per share k = percentage discount rate However, this model is quite restrictive as it is unreasonable to assume that the same amount of dividend will be paid by a stock for an indefinite time period. The model may be useful for determining the value of preferred stock which usually yields a fixed amount of dividend. Constant (Gordon) growth model The major drawback of the zero growth model is that it is assumed that a firm will pay the same dividend throughout its lifetime. However, in the real world most companies are expected to grow over time and consequently make more profits leading to more dividends being paid. This model assumes that there is a constant growth rate for the corporation being analysed and it is most suitable for valuation of stable and mature companies. This model was created by Myron Gordon, and thus it was named as the Gordon Model. The formula for constant growth model is derived from the zero growth model. If the dividends are assumed to grow at a certain constant rate, the formula becomes: Where g = annual constant percentage growth in dividends per share D = next years dividends. The Gordon growth model is a simple and powerful approach to valuing equity. In order for the model to work the following assumptions must be held: Dividends will grow at a constant rate and it will continue for an infinite period. The required rate of return is greater than the steady growth rate. The required rate of return is constant until infinity. It is also important to note that the model has some limitations. The Gordon growth model is a simple and convenient way of valuing stocks but it is extremely sensitive to the inputs for the growth rate. Used incorrectly, it can yield misleading or even absurd results, since, as the growth rate converges on the discount rate, the value goes to infinity. As the growth rate approaches the cost of equity, the value per share approaches infinity. If the growth rate exceeds the cost of equity, the value per share becomes negative. Multistage Dividend Discount Model The assumption of the Gordon Growth Model that there is a stable dividend growth rate from now on to the indefinite future is not realistic for many or even most companies. The studies of Sharpe, Alexander and Bailey (1999) state that the growth fall into three stages namely the growth phase, transition phase and the mature phase. Two-stage Dividend Discount Model The two-stage growth model allows for two stages of growth an initial phase where the growth rate is not a stable growth rate and a subsequent steady state where the growth rate is stable and is expected to remain so for the long term. While, in most cases, the growth rate during the initial phase is higher than the stable growth rate, the model can be adapted to value companies that are expected to post low or even negative growth rates for a few years and then revert back to stable growth. The model is based upon two stages of growth, an extraordinary growth phase that lasts n years and a stable growth phase that lasts forever afterwards. Value of the Stock = PV of Dividends during extraordinary phase + PV of terminal price Where DPSt = Expected dividends per share in year t ke = Cost of Equity (hg: High Growth period; st: Stable growth period) Pn = Price (terminal value) at the end of year n g = Extraordinary growth rate for the first n years gn = Steady state growth rate forever after year n There are three problems with the two-stage dividend discount model. The first two would apply to any two-stage model and the third is specific to the dividend discount model. The first practical problem is in defining the length of the extraordinary growth period. Since the growth rate is expected to decline to a stable level after this period, the value of an investment will increase as this period is made longer. The second problem with this model lies in the assumption that the growth rate is high during the initial period and is transformed overnight to a lower stable rate at the end of the period. While these sudden transformations in growth can happen, it is much more realistic to assume that the shift from high growth to stable growth happens gradually over time. The focus on dividends in this model can lead to skewed estimates of value for firms that are not paying out what they can afford in dividends. In particular, we will under estimate the value of firms that accumulate cash and pay out too little in dividends. The H Model for valuing Growth Fuller and Hsia (1984) presented the H model is a two-stage model for growth, but unlike the classical two-stage model, the growth rate in the initial growth phase is not constant but declines linearly over time to reach the stable growth rate in steady stage. The model is based upon the assumption that the earnings growth rate starts at a high initial rate and declines linearly over the extraordinary growth period (which is assumed to last 2H periods) to a stable growth rate. It also assumes that the dividend payout and cost of equity are constant over time and are not affected by the shifting growth rates. However, the limitations of this model is that it avoids the problems associated with the growth rate dropping precipitously from the high growth to the stable growth phase, but it does so at a cost. First, the growth rate is expected to strictly decline linearly. Therefore small deviations from this assumption do not affect the value significantly, but large deviations can cause problems. Another important point is that the assumption that the payout ratio is constant through both phases of growth exposes the analyst to an inconsistency i.e. as growth rates decline the payout ratio usually increases. Three-stage Dividend Discount Model The three-stage dividend discount model combines the features of the two-stage model and the H-model. It allows for an initial period of high growth, a transitional period where growth declines and a final stable growth phase. It is the most general of the models because it does not impose any restrictions on the payout ratio. This model assumes an initial period of stable high growth, a second period of declining growth and a third period of stable low growth that lasts forever. This model removes many of the constraints imposed by other versions of the dividend discount model. In return, however, it requires a much larger number of inputs for instance year specific payout ratios, growth rates and betas. For firms where there is substantial noise in the estimation process, the errors in these inputs can overwhelm any benefits that accrue from the additional flexibility in the model. Estimating k and g Companies with unpredictable or recurring earnings pattern, or rapidly thriving companies, require a more complex dividend capitalisation model framework that can accommodate dissimilar dividend growth patterns. In practice, applications may require elaborate variations of the dividend capitalisation model, nevertheless this simplified form provides a convenient means of analysing the determinants of stock value. To begin with, the value of the stock should be greater, the greater the earning power and capacity of the corporation to pay out current dividends, D. Correspondingly, the higher the growth rate of the dividends, g, the greater the value of the corporations stock. Finally, the greater the risk of the corporation (the higher the discount rate, k) the lower will be the value of the stock. The discount rate is alternatively referred to as a required return. It is composed of two elements-a risk-free return and a risk premium. The risk-free return is, in turn, generally considered to consist of a real return component and an inflation premium. The real return is the basic investment compensation that investors demand for forgoing current consumption or, alternatively, the compensation for saving. Investors also require a premium to compensate for inflation; this premium will be high when the inflation rate is expected to be high and low when the inflation rate is expected to be low. Because the real return and the inflation premium comprise a basic return demanded by all investors, the risk-free return is a component of all securities. The risk premium is made up of the following elements-interest rate risk, purchasing power risk, business risk and financial risk. The risk premium might be considered to be a function of the stocks systematic risk (beta), which is determ ined by these four fundamental risk factors. As securities differ in their exposure to these risk elements, the premium or return that investors require to compensate for risk will differ across securities. The constant dividend growth model reveals that the following three factors affect stock prices, ceteris paribus: 1) the higher the dividend, the higher the stock price; 2) the higher the dividend growth rate, the higher the stock price; 3) the lower the required rate of return r, the higher the stock price. Empirical Studies on the DDM Issues of dividend policy range from its puzzle by Black (1976) to its irrelevance by Miller and Modigliani (1961), to its relevance by DeAngelo et al. (1996). Other issues include theories on dividend payment, such as stakeholders theory, pecking order theory, agency cost, signalling theory, bird-in-hand fallacy and clientele effect. The information asymmetry between managers and shareholders, along with the separation of ownership and control, formed the base for another explanation of why dividend policy has been so popular. Dividend irrelevance theory Miller and Modigliani (1961) proposed that dividend policy is irrelevant to the shareholder and that stockholder wealth is unchanged when all aspects of investment policy are fixed and any increase in the current payout is financed by fairly priced stock sales. The main assumption is that there is 100 per cent payout by management in every period. Other assumptions are: that there exist perfect capital markets; that is, no taxes or transactional cost, the market price cannot be influenced by a single buyer or seller, and free and costless access to information about the market; that investors are rational and that they value securities based on the value of discounted future cash flow to investors; that managers act as the best agents of shareholders; and that there is certainty about the investment policy of the firm, with full knowledge of future cash flows. Bird-in-hand theory Al-Malkawi (2007) asserts that in a world of uncertainty and information asymmetry, dividends are valued differently from retained earnings (capital gains): A bird in hand (dividend) is worth more than two in the bush (capital gains). Owing to the uncertainty of future cash flow, investors will often tend to prefer dividends to retained earnings. Though this argument has been widely criticised and has not received strong empirical support, it has been supported by Gordon and Shapiro (1956), Lintner (1962) and Walter (1963). The main assumptions are: that investors have imperfect information about the profitability of a firm; that cash dividends are taxed at a higher rate than when capital gain is realized on the sale of a share; and that dividends function as a signal of expected cash flows. Signalling hypothesis Though Miller and Modigliani (1961) assumed that investors and management have perfect knowledge about a firm, this has been countered by many researchers, as management who look after the firm tend to have more precise and timely information about the firm than outside investors. This, therefore, creates a gap between managers and investors; to bridge this gap, management use dividends as a tool to convey private information to shareholders (Al-Malkawi, 2007). Petit (1972) observed that the amount of dividends paid seems to carry great information about the prospects of a firm; this can be evidenced by the movement of share price. An increase in dividends may be interpreted as good news and brighter prospects, and vice versa. But Lintner (1956) observed that management are reluctant to reduce dividends even when there is a need to do so, and only increase dividends when it is believed that earnings have permanently increased. Clientele effects of dividends theories. Investors tend to prefer stocks of companies that satisfy a particular need. This is because investors face different tax treatments for dividends and capital gains and also face some transaction costs when they trade securities. Miller and Modigliani (1961) argued that for these costs to be minimised, investors tend towards firms that would give them those desired benefits. Likewise, firms would attract different clientele based on their dividend policies. Though they argued that even though clientele effect may change a firms dividend policy, one clientele is as good as another, therefore dividend policy remains irrelevant. Al-Malkawi (2007) affirms that firms in their growth stage, which tend to pay lower dividends, would attract clientele that desire capital appreciation, while firms in their maturity stage, which pay higher dividends, attract clientele that require immediate income in the form of dividends. Al-Malkawi (2007) grouped the clientele effect into two groups, those th at are driven by tax effects and those driven by transaction cost. He argued that investors in higher tax brackets would prefer firms that pay little or no dividends, to get reward in the form of share price appreciation, and vice versa. Transaction cost-induced clientele, on the other hand, arises when small investors depend on dividend payments for their needs; this clientele prefers companies who satisfy this need because they cannot afford the high transaction cost of selling securities. Dividends form the hard core of stock values. As Justice Holmes remarked, the commercial value of property consists in the expectation of income from it. (In Galveston, H. S. A. Ry. Co. v. Texas, 210 U. S. 217, 226.) Black (1976) observed, The harder we look at the dividend picture, the more it seems like a puzzle, with pieces that just dont fit together Williams applied Fishers work on stock valuation and developed the famous dividend discount model (DDM) (Fewings, 1979, p. 12). Williams defines the investment value of stock as the present worth of all the dividends to be paid upon it (Williams, 1956, p. 55). He further makes it clear that the investment value of a common stock is the present worth of its net dividend to perpetuity (Williams, 1956, p. 63). Amid this theoretical research, the academic world was divided and a fierce debate erupted concerning the irrelevance of dividend policy in the determination of the valuation of firms or their stocks. The inconsequence of dividend policy in the stock valuation contemplates the equivalence of the valuation using earning approach and the valuation using discounted dividend approach. Fishers inter-temporal investment and consumption model predicted that earnings which are reinvested at the going rate of capital instead of being released for consumption neither adds nor subtracts from the value of the overall stream of benefits (Fewings, 1979, p. 17). Thus, according to Fisher, dividend policy is irrelevant in the valuation of stocks. One must remember that Fishers theory is applicable under perfect capital markets with certain futures. At the same time, Graham and Dodd (1934) developed their valuation methodologies based on the assumption that the firms main objective is to pay dividends to shareholders. Empirical evidence in the market suggested a positive correlation between stock prices and dividend payout (Harkavy, 1953), suggesting the relevance of dividends in the valuation of stocks. Gordon and Shapiro (1956), Walter (1956) and Solomon (1963) supported this hypothesis. In accordance with the relevance of the dividend policy on the valuation of stocks, Gordon extended Williams model of stock valuation to include retained earnings. He further developed the model to include continuous equity financing. These dividend dependent models are called the bird-in-the-hand models by authors like Frankfurter et al. (2003), as they are based on the assumption that there are two opportunity rates one for the firm and the other for the investor. The firm should retain 100 per cent of its earnings if the opportunity rate of a firm is greater than the opportunity rate of the investor. The seminal paper of Miller and Modigliani (1961) argued the irrelevance of dividend policy and the equivalence of the valuation of stocks using four approaches, namely the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach, the current earnings plus future investment opportunities approach, the discounted dividend approach and the stream of earnings approach. This equivalence was proven under assumptions of perfect capital markets, rational behaviour and perfect certainty. In addition, Miller and Modigliani (1961) point out that the dividend policy may be relevant when a revision in the dividend policy points to some information that the investors do not know. This information content of dividends argument led to the development of dividend signaling models. The irrelevance of dividends is not resolved. Academics are still divided into two, if not more, schools of thought on the subject. Price Earnings Ratio A firms profitability, risk, quality of management, and many other factors are reflected in its stock and security prices. Hence, market value ratios indicate the markets assessment of the value of the firms securities. The price/earnings (P/E) ratio is simply the market price of the firms common stock divided by its annual earnings per share. Sometimes called the earnings multiple, the P/E ratio shows how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of the firms earnings per share. Earnings per share comes from the income statement, so it is sensitive to the many factors that affect the construction of an income statement, from the choice of GAAP to management decisions regarding the use of debt to finance assets. The price/earnings ratio is stated as: Stock prices are determined from the actions of informed buyers and sellers in an impersonal market. Stock prices reflect much of the known information about a company and are fairly good indicators of a companys true value. Although earnings per share cannot reflect the value of patents or assets, the quality of the firms management, or its risk, stock prices can and do reflect all of these factors. Comparing a firms P/E to that of the stock market as a whole, or with the firms competitors, indicates the markets perception of the true value of the company. While the P/E ratio measures the markets valuation of the firm relative to the income statement value for per-share earnings, the price-to-book value ratio measures the markets valuation relative to balance sheet equity. The book value of equity is simply the difference between the book values of assets and liabilities appearing on the balance sheet. The price-to-book-value ratio is the market price per share divided by the book v alue of equity per share. A higher ratio suggests that investors are more optimistic about the market value of a firms assets, its intangible assets, and the ability of its managers. The price-to-book value ratio is stated as: Market value indicators reflect the markets perception of the true worth of a firms future prospects. As such, market perceptions of a firms value are important to the financial analyst. However, the market may not be perfect; investors may become overly optimistic or pessimistic about a firm. The fact that a firm presently has a higher P/E or price-to-book-value ratio than its competition does not automatically imply that the firm is better managed or really deserves its higher valuation. Some firms may have low market value ratios because they truly deserve them; other firms may suffer from extreme and undeserved pessimism on the part of the market. High market value ratios can be similarly deceptive. The analyst must determine whether a firm deserves its market value ratios or not. Empirical Studies on the P/E model Ball and Brown (1968) are amongst the first pioneers who provided evidence that accounting earnings are potentially useful to investors for the valuation of equity. Furthermore, Beaver, Clarke and Wright (1979) also concluded that earnings act as a major determinant for equity valuation. Despite many researchers were inspired by the work of Ball and Brown prior study on price earnings ratio may trace back to 1934 when Graham and Dame considered that the major factors affecting price earnings ratio are factors coming from investors and companies. Internal scholars pay more attention to price earnings ratio status and qualitative or quantitative studies using cross sectional data model or time serials model are made in detail when stock market is established. As an important index measuring stock investment value and reflecting stock market development status, price earnings ratio is not only useful for department of banking custody to make sound regulation measures but helpful for inv estors to distinguish stock investing risk and select advisable invest strategy. Shroff (1995) cites that earnings of firms with high P/E ratio and high return on equity exhibit higher explanatory powers for stock returns. According to Barth et al. (1998) income statement plays fundamental role for equity valuation. Burgstahler Dichev (1997) found that book value and earnings being interrelated, act as component of equity value. Therefore it implies that the value of the firm can be expressed as a function of both earnings and book value of equity. Consequently, the higher is the earnings to book value ratio, the more relevant earnings will be as a determinant of equity value. While a lower earnings to book value ratio will imply book value being more important determinants of equity value. According to the work of Jan Ou (1995) firms which are reporting net losses, their earnings explain very little of equity price, but on the other hand book value of equity is an important determinant of stock price. Penman (1998) finds that book value provides greater relevance than earnings in equity valuation for firms with an extreme earnings to book ratio. Collins et al. (1997) further report that the value-relevance of earnings and book value of equity moves inversely to each other. Ou and Penman (1989) note that P/E ratios are good predictors of future earnings while changes in share price are poor predictors of future earnings. Ou Sepe (2002) find that the larger the spread between analysts forecasts of a firms future earnings and reported current earnings, the less value-relevant current earnings and the more the market relies on book value for equity valuation. Researches undertaken by Nicholson (1960), McWilliams (1966), Latane et al. (1969), Dowen and Bauman (1986), Keim (1990), and Fama and French (1992) provide evidence that stock returns are linked to P/E ratios. Penman (1996) notes that the P/E ratio acts not as a predictor of share price or returns but of future earnings levels. Allen et al. (1998) conclude similarly as their results indicate that firms with high E/P stocks have relatively low earnings growth while companies with low E/P shares experience high earnings growth. Furthermore, Fuller et al. (1992) conclude that low P/E ratio stocks generate low future earnings growth while high P/E ratio shares result in high earnings growth. Another line of research (e.g., Beaver, 1989; Mande, 1994) provides strong evidence that earnings aids investors in evaluating a firms dividend paying ability. As Larcker (1989) notes, share price is determined in the market through capitalisation (i.e., discounting) of the future cash flows or dividends expected to accrue to stockholders. Since earnings provide an information signal about future cash flows, stock price is affected by expectations concerning earnings. Because P/E ratios act as predictors of future earnings, these ratios are also linked to share price or returns. Moreover Nelson and Kim (1993) and Campbell and Shiller (1988) have documented that dividend yield predicts stock returns with some success, as it capture expectations about dividend growth as well as expected returns. While Lamont (1998) argues that the P/E ratio has independent predictive power for excess returns in addition to the dividend price ratio. Ang and Bekaert (2003) detect a strong role for the P/E ratio as a predictive instrument for future dividend growth. Since the P/E ratio is a function of expected growth in earnings, obviously expected growth in earnings are eminent in the valuation of a stock. Limitations of P/E The P/E is a fairly simple tool for assessing company value. But it has been argued that  the P/E ratio is not always reliable. There are plenty of reasons to be wary of P/E based stock valuations. The P/E ratio is supposed to enumerate how many years worth of current earnings a company will need to produce in order to arrive at its current market share value. Naturally, investors want to be able to buy more earnings for every dollar they pay, so the lower the P/E ratio, the less expensive the stock. The calculation of the ratio sounds simple enough, but here are some of the dangers associated with taking P/E ratios at face value. The first part of the P/E equation, price, is straightforward. The market price is easily available from the stock exchange market. On the other hand, coming up with an appropriate earnings number can be tricky. You have to make a lot of decisions how to define earnings. Earnings are not always clear cut. Earnings can be affected by unusual gains or losses which sometimes obscure the true nature of the earnings metric. Whats more, reported earnings can be manipulated by company management to meet earnings expectations, while creative accounting choices, shifting depreciation policies or adding or subtracting non-recurring gains and expenses, can make bottom line earnings numbers bigger and, in turn, P/E ratios, smaller and the stock appear less expensive. Investors need to be wary of how companies arrive at their reported EPS numbers. Appropriate adjust ments often have to be done in order to obtain a more accurate measure of earnings than what is reported on the balance sheet. Then there is the matter of whether to use trailing earnings or forward earnings figures. Located right in the companys latest published income statement, historic earnings are easy to find. Unfortunately, they are not much use for investors, since they say very little about what earnings are in store for the year and years ahead. Its the companys future earnings that investors are interested in most since as they reflect a stocks future prospects. The biggest limitation of the P/E ratio is that it tells investors next to nothing about the companys EPS growth prospects. If the company is growing quickly, you will be comfortable buying it even it had a high P/E ratio, knowing that growth in EPS will bring the P/E back down to a lower level. If it is not growing quickly, you might shop around for a stock with a lower P/E ratio. It is often difficult to tell if a high P/E multiple is the result of expected growth or if the stock is simply overvalued. A P/E ratio, even one calculated using a forward earnings estimate, does not always tell whether or not the P/E is appropriate to the companys forecasted growth rate. Finally, theres the tricky issue of a companys debt load. The P/E ratio does nothing to factor in the amount of debt that a company carries on its balance sheet. Debt levels have an impact on financial performance and valuation, yet the P/E does not allow investors to make comparisons between debt-free firms and those bogged down with outstanding loans and liabilities.

Essay on Social Networking Sites

Essay on Social Networking Sites Social networking sites peaked the year 2007. These sites encouraged online social connections. Early sites such as SixDegrees. com and Friendster allowed people to manage a list of friends. One drawback to these sites was that they did not offer users the ability to publish content like blogs. Social networking sites begin with a group of founders sending out messages to friends to join the network. In turn the friends send out messages to their friends, and the network grows. When members join the network, they create a profile.Depending on the site, users can customize their profile to reflect their interests. They also begin to have contact with friends, acquaintances, and strangers. Founded in 2002, Friendster used the model of friends inviting friends to join in order to grow its network. It quickly signed on millions of users. Unfortunately, as the site grew larger, technical issues surfaced. Painfully slow servers made it difficult for users t o move around the site. Additionally, management enforced strict policies on fake profiles. These false profiles, or â€Å"fakesters,† as they were known, were deleted by the site.This approach turned off users. Eventually, Friendster began to lose members in the United States. Fellow networking site SixDegrees. com closed its doors after the dot-com bust in 2000. Within a few years, these early social networking sites found their popularity declining. At the same time, a new social networking site called MySpace was beginning to take off. THE RISE OF MYSPACE MySpace brought together the social features of networking sites and the publishing capabilities of blogs. The combination of the two tools struck a home run with teens. Young people were looking for a more social way to blog.MySpace provided the solution. In 2003 Tom Anderson and Chris DeWolfe launched MySpace in Santa Monica, California. As music fans, the pair designed the site as a place to promote local music acts. They also wanted to be able to connect with other fans and friends. On MySpace, users created a Web page with a personal profile. Then they invited other users to become their friends. According to DeWolfe, the bands were a great marketing tool in the beginning. He said: â€Å"All these creative people became ambassadors for MySpace by using us as their de facto promotional platform.People like to talk about music, so the bands set up a natural environment to communicate. â€Å"1 Anderson and DeWolfe were determined to keep MySpace an open site. Anyone could join the community, browse profiles, and post whatever they wanted. User control was one of their founding principles. It also made initial financing hard to find. According to Anderson: â€Å"We'd get calls from investor types who wanted to meet us. They would say ‘Your site isn't professional. Why do you let users control the pages? They're so ugly! ‘†2 In the meantime MySpace continued to sign people up. Teens and young adults loved the site.They flocked to create their own profiles. The ability to customize pages, load music, and share videos added to the MySpace appeal. Unlike other early social networking sites, MySpace gave users a media-rich experience. Users could express themselves on their Web page by adding music and video clips. At the same time, they could socialize with friends. MySpace made social contact easier with tools such as e-mail, comment posts, chat rooms, buddy lists, discussion boards, and instant messaging. MySpace brought together the ability to express oneself and to socialize in one place.The timing was perfect. Over the next two years, MySpace grew at a tremendous pace. The site's success brought attention from investors. Rupert Murdoch, famous for his media empire, wanted to buy MySpace. Murdoch had interests in television, film, newspapers, publishing, and the Internet. In 2005 Murdoch purchased MySpace for an amazing $580 million. By early 2008 MySpac e had grown to a mind-blowing 110 million active users. It signed an average of thirty thousand people up every day. One in four Americans was on MySpace. The Web site had become the giant among social networking sites.It was the most trafficked site on the Internet. MySpace's influence traveled outside of the United States. The company built a local presence in over twenty international territories. MySpace could be found in places such as the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, and Latin America. In a few short years, MySpace had become a worldwide cultural phenomenon. SOCIAL NETWORKING BEYOND MYSPACE The success of MySpace in the social networking arena spurred the development and redesign of many other online social networks. Some sites appealed to a general audience.Others, such as Black Planet, LinkedIn, and MyChurch, sought to serve a niche market. Facebook was one site that emerged as an alternative to MySpace. In February 2004 Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook . The site began as a closed network for college students. Closed networks only allow users to join if they meet certain criteria. In contrast, sites such as MySpace and Friendster were open social networking sites. Anyone could sign up for an account. Open and closed social networks have advantages and disadvantages. Open networks foster interaction between adults and teens.Parents can check up on their teen's profile and decide if they are comfortable with their child's online image. On the other hand, open access means that profiles are completely public and can attract unwanted attention. Closed networks are generally smaller. As such, there is a greater chance a user will know other members both online and offline. But a closed network blocks parents from reading their teen or college student's profile. Being closed also limits a social network's ability to grow and attract new users. As a closed college network, Facebook grew by adding more colleges to its network.By the end o f 2004, Facebook had almost 1 million active users. As Facebook's popularity grew, it expanded beyond colleges to high school and international school users. At this point, however, the site was still restricted to a limited pool of student users. In 2006 Facebook made a pivotal decision. It opened the network to the general public, expanding beyond its original student base. By May 2008 Facebook boasted over 70 million active users. At that time, it was the second-most trafficked social networking site behind MySpace and the sixth-most trafficked site on the Web.As an alternative to MySpace, Facebook's social network gained popularity with business professionals and colleagues. Facebook's purpose was to help users connect online with people that they already knew offline. Unlike the wild-looking pages found on MySpace, Facebook promoted a clean, orderly online experience. VIDEO- AND PHOTO-SHARING SITES Online social networking evolved into a full multimedia experience with the arri val of video- and photo-sharing Web sites. Users could upload visual content to share with friends and other users. Photo-sharing sites such as Flickr enabled users to transfer digital photos online to share with others.Users decided whether to share their photos publicly or limit access to private groups. Users could also use the site's features to organize and store pictures and video. One of the most popular video-sharing Web sites was YouTube. The site, founded in 2005, used Adobe Flash technology to display clips from movies and television, music videos, and video blogs. Users could upload, share, and view video clip topics from the latest movies to funny moments captured on film. Not everyone wanted to create a profile, write a blog, or upload pictures and video.Other social networking tools allowed these users to participate online. E-mails sent messages to a friend's electronic mailbox. Instant messaging was a real-time conversation between two people online at the same time . Comment posting allowed users to interact and talk about a friend's blog, profile, or pictures. Even online gaming was a form of social networking, allowing players to meet other people with similar interests online. WHY IS ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING SO POPULAR? The popularity of online social networking has prompted researchers to explore the similarities between online social networks and tribal societies.According to Lance Strate, a communications professor at Fordham University, social networks appeal to people because they feel more like talking than writing. â€Å"Orality is the base of all human experience,† said Strate. â€Å"We evolved with speech. We didn't evolve with writing. â€Å"3 Irwin Chen, an instructor at Parsons design school, is developing a new course to explore oral culture online. He agrees with Strate. â€Å"Orality is participatory, interactive, communal and focused on the present,† he says. â€Å"The Web is all of these things. â€Å"4 Mi chael Wesch teaches cultural anthropology at Kansas State University.He studied how people form social relationships while living with a tribe in Papua New Guinea. He compared the tribe to online social networking. â€Å"In tribal cultures, your identity is completely wrapped up in the question of how people know you,† he said. â€Å"When you look at Facebook, you can see the same pattern at work: people projecting their identities by demonstrating their relationships to each other. You define yourself in terms of who your friends are. â€Å"5 Despite the connections between social networks and tribal cultures, significant differences exist.In tribal societies relationships form through face-to-face contact. Social networks allow users to hide behind a computer screen. Tribal societies embrace formal rituals. Social networks value a casual approach to relationships. Millions of people across the world have joined online social networks. Perhaps their popularity stems from o ur innate desire to be part of a community. According to Strate, social networking â€Å"fulfills our need to be recognized as human beings, and as members of a community. We all want to be told: You exist. â€Å"6

Injections and Withdrawals Essay

Injections and Withdrawals are important features in our understanding of economic activity and the business cycle. Explain the relationship between them and how they influence national income. * Injections-only part of demand for firms arises through consumers, the remainder comes from other sources outside the inner flow. Investment- This is the money firms spend after obtaining it from various financial institutions, either past savings or loans or through new issue of shares. They may invest in equipment or building up stocks. Government Expenditure- When government spend money on goods and services produced by firms. This has a negative impact on national income as it reduces money available but can increase national income through expenditure and increased production. Export Expenditure- Money floes into circular flow from abroad when residents abroad buy our exports of goods and services. Positive for economic growth and increases national income. (source:economics) * Withdrawals- only part of households income spent goods and services, the remainder will be withdrawn from the inner flow. Net Saving- Saving is money households choose not to spend and put aside for future. If households don’t spend as much then national income falls, not many products brought, revenue falls. Whereas if they spend instead of save, national income increases. Net Taxes- Withdrawal of money from inner flow with no choice. National income increases by collecting taxes, more money available for government. However paying benefits to unemployed workers money flows other way and reduces national income. Import Expenditure- Households spend some of their income on imported goods and services. Although money consumers spend on such goods initially flows domestic retailers, it eventually finds it way abroad decreasing national income. (source:economics) GDP – Measures national income. GDP = Gross Domestic Product. * Measures of national income- > Product approach- Net saving increases, products brought and sold decreases, GDP falls which decreases national income > Income approach- Net taxes increases, households incomes are reduced and therefore have less disposable income which reduces national income. > Expenditure approach- expenditure increases more money entering economy, increasing GDP and national income. (source:Bized) Relationship between Injections and Withdrawals. Indirect links- * Saving and Investment- o If more money is saved then there will be more money for banks and other financial institutions to lend out. o Saving increases then investment falls o Saving increases then national income decreases since people are saving and not spending, GDP falls.(source: Business) * Taxation and Government Expenditure- o If tax receipts are higher, the government may be more keen to increase its expenditure. o Taxation increases government expenditure increases. o Taxation increase, households have less disposable income, hence GDP falls which reduces national income. (source:Business) * Imports and exports- o If imports increase, incomes of people abroad will increase, which will enable them to purchase more of our exports. o Imports increase then the balance of payments becomes deficit. (source:Business) * However there’s no guarantee. o Firms may wish to invest more or less than people wish to save o Governments can spend more than they receive in taxes or vice versa; o Exports can exceed imports or vice versa; (source:tutor2u.net) > Decisions to save and invest are made by different people , thus they plan to invest and save different amounts. > Demand for imports may not be equal to demand for exports > Governments may choose not to make taxation equal to government spending, it may choose to spend all of its tax revenues- budget surplus, or spend more than it receives in tax- budget deficit. THUS PLANNED INJECTIONS MAY NOT EQUAL PLANNED WITHDRAWALS. Bibliography Economics- John Sloman Business Environment- Dr Phil Drummond www.Bized.ac.uk www.Tutor2u.net